Current:Home > reviewsPennsylvania’s mail-in ballot dating rule is legal under civil rights law, appeals court says -Summit Capital Strategies
Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballot dating rule is legal under civil rights law, appeals court says
View
Date:2025-04-15 04:20:30
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A requirement for Pennsylvania voters to put accurate handwritten dates on the outside envelopes of their mail-in ballots does not run afoul of a civil rights law, a federal appeals court panel said Wednesday, overturning a lower court ruling.
A divided 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled to uphold enforcement of the required date on return envelopes, a technical mandate that caused thousands of votes to be declared invalid in the 2022 election.
The total number is a small fraction of the large state’s electorate, but the court’s ruling puts additional attention on Pennsylvania’s election procedures ahead of a presidential election in which its Electoral College votes are up for grabs.
A lower court judge had ruled in November that even without the proper dates, mail-in ballots should be counted if they are received in time. U.S. District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter said the envelope date is irrelevant in helping elections officials decide whether a ballot was received in time or if a voter is qualified.
In the court’s opinion, Judge Thomas Ambro said the section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that the lower court relied upon does not pertain to ballot-casting rules broadly, such as dates on envelopes, but “is concerned only with the process of determining a voter’s eligibility to cast a ballot.”
“The Pennsylvania General Assembly has decided that mail-in voters must date the declaration on the return envelope of their ballot to make their vote effective,” Ambro wrote. “The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously held this ballot-casting rule is mandatory; thus, failure to comply renders a ballot invalid under Pennsylvania law.”
The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which helped represent groups and voters who challenged the date mandate, said the ruling could mean thousands of votes won’t be counted over what it called a meaningless error.
“We strongly disagree with the panel majority’s conclusion that voters may be disenfranchised for a minor paperwork error like forgetting to write an irrelevant date on the return envelope of their mail ballot,” Ari Savitzky, a lawyer with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project who argued the appeal, said in a statement. “We are considering all of our options at this time.”
State and national Republican groups defended the date requirement, and the Republican National Committee called the decision a “crucial victory for election integrity and voter confidence.”
In Pennsylvania, Democrats have been far more likely to vote by mail than Republicans under an expansion of mail-in ballots enacted in 2019.
veryGood! (354)
Related
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Change of venue denied for Michigan school shooter’s father
- Alabama lawmakers move to protect IVF treatment
- Prosecutors to seek retrial in former Ohio deputy’s murder case
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Podcaster Bobbi Althoff and Ex Cory Settle Divorce 2 Weeks After Filing
- Ohio mom who left toddler alone when she went on vacation pleads guilty to aggravated murder
- The Quantitative Trading Journey of Dashiell Soren
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Amy Schumer Calls Out Critics Who Are “Mad” She’s Not Thinner and Prettier
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Missing Texas girl Audrii Cunningham found dead: What to know about missing children cases
- Clues to a better understanding of chronic fatigue syndrome emerge from major study
- Hotel California lyrics trial reveals Eagles manager cited God Henley in phone call
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- A man accused of stabbing another passenger on a Seattle to Las Vegas flight charged with assault
- Biometric gun safes are recalled because they don't keep out unauthorized users, including kids
- Iowa vs. Indiana: Caitlin Clark struggles as Hawkeyes upset by Hoosiers
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Biden ally meets Arab American leaders in Michigan and tries to lower tensions over Israel-Hamas war
DOE announces conditional $544 million loan for silicon carbide wafer production at Michigan plant
A Kansas county shredded old ballots as the law required, but the sheriff wanted to save them
The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
Georgia board upholds firing of teacher for reading a book to students about gender identity
Georgia Senate backs $5 billion state spending increase, including worker bonuses and roadbuilding
Best women's basketball games to watch: An angry Caitlin Clark? That's must-see TV.